Eight principles for deploying AI agents, each with a test you can run inside your own organisation. Updated for the September 2026 debate about pacing frontier AI: the labs are debating their pace - you set yours.
Your firm needs its own embedded evaluator - Who checks your agent that didn't build it?
Your request opened as a pre-filled email to george@netlifestyle.ai. Send it and your copy of the Manifesto follows by reply. If nothing opened, email us directly at george@netlifestyle.ai.
The PDF adds the evidence test under every principle, a scorecard and the 2026 preface.
Three principles rewritten with the boundary they were missing, plus Principle 08: Verified trust over self-assessment.
One evidence test under every principle.
Step one, not a verdict.
What the labs proposed in September 2026, and what it leaves to organisations deploying agents.
A professional-services firm (hypothetical), principle by principle.
An engineering view, not legal advice.
Read them here. The PDF adds the evidence test under each one and the scorecard that ties them together.
AI agents should enhance human capabilities rather than simply replace them - empowering people to achieve more, working alongside humans as partners.
Systems that learn and respond to changing contexts, within limits that have been tested - and that hand the decision back to a human when they move beyond them.
Users should understand what an agent is doing and why - building appropriate trust through visibility.
Technical performance matters, but serving human needs, preferences and values matters more. Agents should be intuitive and aligned with human intent.
Agents that communicate and coordinate with humans and other agents, while each stays within its own mandate and answerable to people who can see, and stop, any one of them.
Powerful capabilities must be matched with appropriate safeguards, operating within boundaries that prevent harm while maximising benefit.
Agents that learn from experience and evolve through feedback, at a pace we can understand and govern - when capability outpaces assurance, we slow down.
Trust in an agent rests on evidence that others can check, not only on the assurances of those who built it - safeguards, evaluations and incidents are open to independent review.
Of professional-services firms that are putting AI agents in front of clients and staff.
Deploying AI agents and accountable for what they do.
Who need evidence, not enthusiasm.
Developers: see the genAI for Developers Meetup →
Dr George Vossos · Melbourne, Australia
PhD in Artificial Intelligence and Law; co-founder and CAIO of WealthPilot Investment Services; former senior roles at IBM and Deloitte; leader of the genAI for Developers Meetup in Melbourne.
Published by Netlifestyle AI.
Full experience and background →Yes.
To send you the PDF. Marketing email is separate and only if you tick the box.
Every email has a one-click unsubscribe link.
No. It is a framework published by Netlifestyle AI. The Agentic Institute's CPD accreditation is in progress.
In MailerLite's EU data centre. See the Privacy Policy.
The Manifesto is the foundation of every Agentic Institute programme.